Previously, I discussed my desire to challenge the way we invite folks to “Look for Cousins.” My consultant mantra is “Prove It.” There is one word of caution when challenging budding family historians to attach sources to their trees.
What makes a good source?
Much is written about what is a good source and what isn’t. The short version is: a good source is an original document, recorded as close to the time of an event and reported by the individuals who know the details of said event first hand.
The actual marriage record that lists the names of the bride and groom, the date they were married and as much of the location as possible is a good source.
It is still a good source even if the informant was the minister who married them and is providing the information to the county recording office within a year of the event. The minister was there and often kept a record of who they married and when. That record may not have survived, and sometimes they’ll report some discrepancies to the recording office.
Regardless, this record is more valuable than an index to a marriage record or a recording of a marriage in a family history book by someone 30 years after an event which by their 3rd cousin three times removed.
Aunt Ruth’s drawn family tree would be a bad record for any family besides herself and her children. There is value in her knowledge as a starting point for research; however, often the tree is wrong as Aunt Ruth misremembers information. Sometimes, these trees are the only source of children who died in infancy or at birth. They have value but do not regularly stand alone.
Many online trees have the census, marriage, birth, and death records from states, provinces, and counties. Attach these to your tree, along with other sources (obits, military records, gravestone resources, naturalization, city directories, and more). Be careful of altering your tree information (marriage date, birthplace, etc.) until you have viewed the actual document.
There are many indexes on FamilySearch that are from extraction projects or temple work submission files. These sources aren’t the original records created by the person who had first-hand knowledge of the event and sometimes is inaccurate.
Many of the extracted records are as accurate an original, but you can never be sure. In the above case, I would need to look at the German Church Book that is available as a Microfilm through the Family History Center.
Finally, be sure to share your sources from your record collection. If you have a family history book that a relative created, but is not available online, create a citation in your online tree or genealogy software for that source. If you have marriage announcements, baby books, diplomas, or other documents in your family record collection, craft a source for that item and attach it to your family member’s profile.
The point is to look for sources and prove why you believe the relationships and vital information on a family tree are accurate. As much as possible, look for a variety of sources for an individual rather than just another person’s undocumented family tree. However, in some cases, one source might be the only recording of a person who is often overlooked.
This overview of sources was meant to serve as an introduction to sources. If you want more depth, look at the FamilySearch Wiki article entitled Genealogy Proof Standard.